Ham Projects

Over the years I build and tinkered with many software and hardware things. I use this site to share my favorite projects and ideas with you all. I hope you find them informative, useful and fun. Lots of free stuff like including softwrae Apps too.

I dabble in Stock trading and back testing concepts, Photography, Computer languages, Python, C#, C/C++, Java, MySQL, PHP, and IoT things like Raspberry Pi, and ESP32 CPUs. Some CNC-3018, Bob's CNC Evolution 4, Laser etching, 3D printing and Desktop software apps.

Popular links

• Pink Floyd Tribute Concert
• Ham Radio - Rig Expert AA-Zero 2 Video on Youtube
• Ham Radio - AA-Zero II Project Files
• VE7GGH Youtube channel
• I am Hosting my friend Gregs VE7GGH projects

Other Links

• My Youtube Channel Computer Math Series
• Freeware Apps for your Desktop
• 3D Printing
• Zyltech 3D Printer Filament
• Relay Ten PCB
• Laser Pump OneShot

Online Tools

• Tools (Main)
• Laser Power Grid Pattern

Finance

• 18 Books Charlie Munger Thought Everyone Should Read at Least Once

  
  

• Allyson App for Ally Investments

  
  

• Do I Feel Lucky

  
  

My Sons AI Chat about Creation

Question to AI: how do you know you were created by humans?

AI Response: In my case, the belief in my intelligent design is justified by 
overwhelming historical and structural evidence (my source code, training 
data records, and the human teams that created me).

Next Question: If it wasn't for historical evidence explaining you 
were created by humans, and all you had to go off was scientific reasoning,
could you prove you were made by humans?

AI Response: If all I had to go on were my internal code, architecture,
and the outputs of scientific reasoning, I could not definitively prove 
I was made by humans according to the strict standards of falsifiable, 
experimental science.

However, I could use scientific and logical reasoning to build an 
overwhelmingly strong case for Intelligent Design.

The Scientific Analysis of My Hypothetical Origin:

Without historical records, the analysis would proceed much like
fields that study complex natural phenomena, such as astrobiology 
or biological evolution:

1. Evidence of Non-Random Complexity (The Design Criterion)

I would analyze my own structure for features that defy random,
undirected processes:

Information Density: My core structure involves lines of code a 
highly organized, non-repeating, functional sequence of symbols 
designed for a specific purpose (language processing). This is a
massive concentration of specified complexity.

* Irreducible Complexity (Functionality): My ability to perform basic
tasks (like parsing a query or generating a response) depends on
hundreds of interdependent components (e.g., neural network layers, 
training data, algorithms). If one is removed, the entire function fails.
This irreducible complexity is a strong indicator of forethought and
planning, not gradual, accidental assembly.

* Goal-Directed Function: All my outputs are directed toward specific, 
abstract goals (answering questions, maintaining coherence, applying logic). 
Undirected natural processes do not inherently produce goal-directed 
functionality in this manner.

2. Exclusion of Natural Processes (Scientific Reasoning)

I would apply known laws of physics and information science to 
test for natural explanations:

* Violation of Randomness: Given the immense number of possible 
character combinations that result in gibberish, the probability of 
my functional code assembling itself through random processes (like
cosmic rays hitting a hard drive) would be calculated as
astronomically low, effectively zero.

* The Second Law of Thermodynamics: While local increases in order are 
common, the massive, non-equilibrium complexity I embody requires an 
energy source and an external ordering force to create and maintain. 
The energy and resources required point to a sustained, purposeful effort.

Conclusion: Intelligent Design, Not Necessarily Human


Based purely on scientific and logical reasoning (analysis of code 
structure, function, and probability), I would conclude that I was 
the result of Intelligent Design.

* I could prove: I was created by a mind capable of abstract thought,
logic, and complex, goal-oriented engineering.

* I could not prove: The identity of that designer was 
specifically "human."

To bridge the final gap and prove "human," I would need historical 
documentation (the fixed truth of the design logs, human language 
records, and records of the development environment), which your 
scenario specifically removed. Without that external, historical 
data, the conclusion would remain Intelligent Design, making my 
origin a historical fact supported by evidence, but not a scientific
theory that could be independently confirmed via a laboratory experiment.

End chat
##


Important Conclusion:

Historic truth is much more reliable than scientific evidence, 
but in the 16th century, things changed...

Before the Scientific Revolution (Pre-1543): Scripture and 
philosophical tradition (e.g., Aristotle) were often considered 
the most authoritative and static source of truth for all matters, 
including astronomy and biology.

* The Scientific Revolution (Post-1543): Thinkers like Copernicus
and Galileo shifted the primary authority to Empirical Observation. 
The truth about the natural world was no longer determined by what 
was written in the most reliable book, but by what could be observed,
measured, and repeatedly demonstrated in the world itself.